Skip to main content Scroll Top

FSMA 204 & The 24-Hour Mandate: Closing Traceability Gaps for Co-Packers

Untitled design (16)

In the world of food safety, a supplier notice is more than just a heads-up—it is a legal trigger. This guide explores the critical intersection of FSMA Rule 204 compliance, the often-misunderstood gap between Product Recall and Withdrawal insurance, and why Substantiation Files are your best defense against both the FDA and the plaintiffs’ bar.

The Scenario: A Ripple Effect in the Produce Supply Chain

Imagine a downstream purchaser—we’ll call them Client A—receives an urgent alert from their primary distributor. The notice identifies a potential Salmonella contamination in a recent shipment of whole cucumbers sourced from an upstream grower.

At this stage, there is no public FDA recall notice. No news reports have aired. Yet, for brands and co-packers, this “upstream notification” triggers immediate duties. Under the Food Safety Modernization Act (FSMA), once you have credible notice of a potential hazard, you are legally expected to act. Waiting for a formal government announcement before isolating product is a gamble that leads to Warning Letters, seizures, and severe civil liability.

The Co-Packer’s “Multi-Tier” Liability Trap

Produce supply chains are inherently layered, which often isolates the source but amplifies the commercial litigation risk for those in the middle:

  1. Source: The Grower/Packer
  2. Distributor: The Wholesale Middleman
  3. Brand Owner: The Client/Marketing Entity
  4. Processor/Co-Packer: The facility slicing, dicing, or repacking the ingredient.

Co-packer liability is a common industry blind spot. Many co-packers believe they are safe because they don’t “own” the raw produce. However, if you process a tainted ingredient into a finished “Ready-to-Eat” salad or snack pack, the law treats the final unit as an integrated system. If one component is adulterated, the whole product is legally defective, and the co-packer is often the first party named in a lawsuit.

FSMA Rule 204: The 24-Hour Traceability Mandate

As of 2026, the FDA’s Food Traceability Rule (Section 204) is in full effect. For “high-risk” foods—including fresh cucumbers—the FDA now mandates strict record-keeping:

  • KDEs (Key Data Elements): Specific data points that must be captured at every step.
  • CTEs (Critical Tracking Events): Data must be recorded for harvesting, cooling, initial packing, shipping, receiving, and transformation.
  • The 24-Hour Rule: Upon request during an investigation, you must provide an electronic, sortable spreadsheet of this traceability data to the FDA within 24 hours.

Juris Law Group Insight: Traceability isn’t just a regulatory hurdle; it’s your legal leverage. Detailed data allows you to perform a “surgical” recall of one specific lot rather than a “blanket” recall of your entire inventory, potentially saving millions in lost product.

Free Resource: Juris Food Recall & Class Action Tracker

Navigating FDA traceback investigations requires real-time intelligence. Juris Law Group provides a Free Food Recall Tracker & Class Action Newsletter specifically for manufacturers, brands, and co-packers

  • Monitor Trends: Track which ingredient categories are trending in FDA enforcement reports.
  • Risk Benchmarking: Identify recurring microbial issues in your specific niche before they hit your facility.
  • Anticipate Litigation: Spot common labeling and contamination triggers before you receive a class action demand letter.

Critical Insurance Gaps: Recall vs. Withdrawal

Many food and beverage founders realize too late that General Liability (GL) policies rarely cover the administrative costs of pulling a product from shelves.

  • Product Withdrawal Insurance: Covers first-party costs like shipping, storage, and destruction of your own product.
  • Product Recall Insurance: Covers third-party losses, such as a retailer’s lost profits or the costs your customers incur because of your ingredient.We routinely review supplier agreements to ensure that “voluntary recalls” triggered by these early supplier notices are properly classified so insurance carriers cannot deny claims based on a “voluntary action” exclusion.

5-Step Response to a Supplier Alert

  1. Isolate & Hold: Physically “red-tag” all suspected inventory and electronically “lock” the lots in your system.
  2. Generate KDE Spreadsheets: Ensure your FSMA 204 data is ready for inspection before the FDA asks.
  3. Audit Indemnification: Confirm your contracts cover “reasonable attorney’s fees” and “customer reimbursement” for the current event.
  4. Build a Substantiation File: Document the scientific and legal reasoning behind every decision made during the hold to protect against future litigation.
  5. Notify Carriers Promptly: Avoid “late notice” defenses that could jeopardize your coverage.

FAQs

Does a supplier notice trigger FSMA duties?

Yes. Actual knowledge of a hazard creates an immediate duty to mitigate under federal law.

Can a co-packer be held liable for an ingredient they didn’t source?

Yes. Under strict liability theories, any party in the chain of distribution can be held responsible for injuries caused by an adulterated product.

Key Takeaway

Data is your strongest shield. In a multi-tier supply chain, the company that can definitively prove where a specific ingredient started and stopped is the one that survives a recall. Don’t wait for a crisis to audit your contracts—use the Juris Food Recall Tracker to stay ahead.

Related Posts