California recently made headlines with its new food safety law, known as the California Food Safety Act, signed into effect by Governor Gavin Newsom. While it was initially dubbed the “Skittles ban” due to concerns about an additive used in the popular candy, this law has far-reaching implications for food manufacturers and consumers alike. Let’s dive into what this law bans, why it matters, and the potential impact it may have.
What Does the Law Ban?
The California Food Safety Act prohibits the sale of food products containing several additives that are already outlawed in the European Union due to concerns about their impact on human health. These additives include:
- Red Dye 3: This common color additive found in candies and various food products was banned from cosmetic use by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) over 30 years ago due to carcinogenic concerns. However, it is still used in some popular candies and foods.
- Propylparaben: Used as a preservative in baked goods like muffins and cakes, as well as in trail mixes.
- Brominated Vegetable Oil: Added to citrus drinks to prevent flavoring oils from floating on top. Although many beverage companies have stopped using it, some continue to employ it in their citrus sodas.
- Potassium Bromate: A substance used to strengthen dough, found in breads, cookies, and tortillas. It has been banned in several countries, including the European Union, the United Kingdom, Canada, and Brazil.
Why Ban These Particular Chemicals?
Scientific studies on rats have linked these chemicals to various health concerns, including carcinogenic properties, neurotoxicity, and endocrine or reproductive damage. The European Union has already banned them from food products, except for red dye 3, which is allowed only in candied cherries. Many brands have shifted away from these chemicals in recent years to prioritize consumer safety.
The Potential Impact
Manufacturers have until January 1, 2027, to reformulate their products to comply with California law. Given the size of California’s market, this could lead companies to remove these additives from their products nationwide. Governor Newsom noted that Skittles, for example, can be found in European countries despite certain additives being banned there. This demonstrates that the food industry can maintain product lines while adhering to different public health laws.
Consumer Advocacy and Opposition
Consumer Reports was a cosponsor of the bill, emphasizing its importance in protecting consumers from potentially harmful food chemicals. However, opponents argue that the law may disrupt operations for manufacturers and retailers, potentially driving up costs for consumers and limiting product availability.
The Broader Context
California has a history of passing laws that influence national consumer markets. Notably, in 2018, voters approved an initiative compelling ranchers to provide more space to livestock. The law faced legal challenges but was ultimately upheld by the U.S. Supreme Court.
While organizations opposing the new food safety law have not announced legal action yet, the law’s implications and its potential effects on the food industry may continue to be a topic of debate and discussion.
In conclusion, California’s Food Safety Act reflects the state’s commitment to protecting consumers by banning certain additives from food products. While opinions on the law differ, its effects may resonate beyond California, potentially leading to nationwide changes in food manufacturing practices.
