The following is a summary of relevant, notable Class Action Lawsuits that were filed during November 2024. Below is a summary of the plaintiff’s allegations. To request a copy of a particular complaint or for queries or further discussion, you’re welcome to reach out via email at [email protected].
1. Aguilar v. Dole
Plaintiff Julian Aguilar filed a class action lawsuit against Dole Food Company, Inc., alleging false advertising and deceptive labeling of Dole Whip products. The complaint claims that Dole’s packaging prominently states “No Artificial Ingredients,” yet the products contain citric acid, which is classified as an artificial preservative. The lawsuit seeks relief under California’s Consumers Legal Remedies Act (CLRA), the Unfair Competition Law (UCL), and breach of express warranty, arguing that the misleading labeling deceived consumers into purchasing a product under false pretenses.
The lawsuit also contends that Dole’s marketing strategy misleads consumers by positioning its frozen dessert as a premium product free from synthetic additives. The plaintiff argues that such labeling misrepresentation causes economic harm to consumers who prioritize natural food products. The case seeks compensatory damages, statutory damages, punitive damages, and injunctive relief to prevent further deceptive marketing practices.
2. Allegretti v. Grimmway
Plaintiff Emily Allegretti filed a class action complaint against Grimmway Enterprises, Inc., alleging that the company sold contaminated carrot products containing E. coli, a bacterium known to cause serious illness. The lawsuit asserts claims for negligence, strict liability for failure to warn, and breach of warranty, alleging that Grimmway knowingly distributed tainted products that posed health risks to consumers. On November 16, 2024, Grimmway initiated a voluntary recall of certain organic carrots due to an E. coli outbreak.
The lawsuit states that Grimmway Farms failed to warn consumers about the risks and did not conduct proper safety testing before distributing the products. Consumers, including the plaintiff, suffered foodborne illnesses after consuming the contaminated carrots, leading to hospitalizations in some cases. The complaint seeks damages for medical expenses, economic losses, and punitive damages for the company’s alleged negligence.
3. Berbano v. Treehouse Foods
Plaintiffs filed a nationwide class action lawsuit against Treehouse Foods, Inc., alleging that the company’s frozen waffles and pancakes were contaminated with Listeria monocytogenes, a dangerous bacterium that can cause listeriosis. The lawsuit highlights that Treehouse Foods issued a product recall on October 18, 2024, followed by an expanded recall onOctober 22, 2024, covering all waffles and pancakes produced at its Brantford, Ontario, facility.
The lawsuit claims that the Listeria outbreak could lead to serious health risks, particularly for pregnant women, newborns, older adults, and immunocompromised individuals. The complaint alleges negligence, breach of express and implied warranties, and unjust enrichment, arguing that Treehouse Foods misled consumers about the safety of its breakfast products. Plaintiffs seek compensatory damages, punitive damages, and injunctive relief.
4. Browne v. Treehouse Foods
Plaintiff Damany Browne filed a class action lawsuit against Treehouse Foods, Inc., citing false advertising and product misrepresentation related to its frozen waffles and pancake products. The lawsuit argues that the company’s failure to disclose Listeria contamination violated consumer protection laws and exposed the public to serious health risks. Treehouse Foods had to issue a massive recall, covering multiple frozen breakfast brands, including Kodiak Cakes, Kroger, and Private Selection.
The lawsuit claims that Treehouse Foods’ recall process was inadequate, failing to properly notify consumers of the Listeria contamination risk. Many consumers unknowingly purchased contaminated products, resulting in severe food poisoning symptoms. The plaintiffs allege fraudulent misrepresentation, negligence, and unfair business practices, seeking monetary damages and corrective actions to improve food safety standards.
5. Bruno v. Biosteel Sports
Plaintiff Perry Bruno filed a class action lawsuit against Biosteel Sports Inc., alleging false advertising regarding its electrolyte supplements. The complaint argues that Biosteel falsely claimed that its sports drinks contained “no preservatives” when they actually included citric acid and sodium citrate, both of which are classified as preservatives under FDA regulations. The lawsuit alleges violations of California’s Unfair Competition Law (UCL) and seeks damages for deceptive labeling.
The lawsuit emphasizes that sports nutrition consumers prioritize clean-label products, and Biosteel’s misrepresentation of ingredients misled health-conscious buyers. Plaintiffs seek monetary compensation, corrective advertising, and reformulated product labels to accurately disclose preservatives in the electrolyte drink mix
6. Campos v. Alacer
Plaintiff Carlos Campos filed a consumer fraud lawsuit against Haleon US Inc. and Alacer Corp., alleging misleading Vitamin C claims for Emergen-C Gummies. The lawsuit states that the product’s packaging claims to contain 750 mg of Vitamin C per serving, but independent lab tests found that the actual content was significantly lower, in violation of FDA labeling regulations.
The lawsuit contends that the false labeling misleads consumers who seek immune-boosting supplements. It alleges violations of California’s Consumer Legal Remedies Act (CLRA), false advertising laws, and unjust enrichment. Plaintiffs demand monetary damages, injunctive relief, and corrective labeling to reflect the true Vitamin C content.
7. Catalano v. Grimmway
Plaintiff Wayne Catalano filed a class action complaint against Grimmway Farms, citing E. coli contamination in its organic carrots. The lawsuit states that Grimmway’s recalled products were sold under various brand names at major retailers, including Trader Joe’s, Whole Foods, and Wegmans. The recall announcement on November 16, 2024, came after multiple foodborne illness reports.
Plaintiffs argue that Grimmway Farms negligently failed to prevent contamination and did not warn consumers about the health risks. The lawsuit seeks compensation for medical expenses, economic damages, and reform in food safety protocols for fresh produce companies
8. Cobovic v. Mars Petcare
Plaintiff Mersada Cobovic filed a false advertising lawsuit against Mars Petcare US, Inc., alleging that the company misrepresented its pet food as “natural” while including synthetic ingredients such as xanthan gum, thiamine mononitrate, and pyridoxine hydrochloride. The lawsuit asserts that consumers paid a premium price for natural pet food that contained synthetic additives.
The complaint alleges deceptive business practices, breach of express warranty, and violations of consumer protection laws. Plaintiffs seek monetary damages, corrective labeling, and new ingredient disclosures on pet food packaging.
9. Cordice v. Angie’s Artisan Treats
Plaintiff Dion Cordice filed a consumer protection lawsuit against Angie’s Artisan Treats LLC, alleging that its Boom Chicka Pop popcorn falsely advertised its calorie content. The lawsuit claims that the product’s “70 Calories Per Cup” label misleads consumers, as the actual serving size contains significantly more calories.
The complaint asserts violations of FDA regulations, false advertising, and unfair business practices. Plaintiffs seek compensatory damages, product label corrections, and injunctive relief to prevent further deceptive calorie claims.
10. Costan v. Costco
Plaintiff Donna Costan filed a class action lawsuit against Costco Wholesale Corporation, alleging that the company engaged in false advertising regarding its Kirkland Signature Fish Oil Supplements. The lawsuit claims that Costco misleads consumers by stating that the product “Helps Support a Healthy Heart,” while studies show omega-3 supplements do not significantly reduce the risk of cardiovascular disease. The complaint cites medical research and FDA reports refuting heart health claims, arguing that Costco falsely markets the product as essential for heart disease prevention.
The lawsuit alleges violations of consumer protection laws, breach of express warranty, and negligence in marketing practices. Plaintiff seeks compensatory damages, corrective advertising, and injunctive relief to prohibit Costco from continuing its misleading heart health claims. The case highlights deceptive supplement marketing, nutritional misinformation, and the impact of false health claims on consumers.
11. Deruelle v. Subway
Plaintiff Heather Deruelle has initiated a class action lawsuit against Subway Restaurants, Inc., claiming that the company deceptively markets its Steak & Cheese Sandwich. The lawsuit asserts that Subway’s advertisements misrepresent the quantity of meat, making the sandwich appear to contain 200% more steak than what is actually served. Plaintiff references false advertising claims, consumer fraud violations, and misleading food photography as grounds for legal action.
The case cites customer complaints on social media, with multiple consumers documenting the discrepancy between Subway’s advertisements and the actual product. Plaintiffs seek monetary damages, injunctive relief, and corrective marketing measures to ensure that Subway provides accurate visual representations of its food products.b
12. Dominguez v. Aldi
Plaintiff Jose Dominguez filed a class action lawsuit against Aldi Inc., alleging false labeling and misrepresentation of its food products as containing natural flavors. The lawsuit states that Aldi’s fruit-flavored products include synthetic additives, despite being marketed as naturally flavored. The case argues that consumers prioritize natural ingredients and were misled into purchasing artificially flavored goods under false pretenses.
The complaint cites FDA regulations on food labeling, emphasizing that misbranded food products violate consumer trust. Plaintiffs seek monetary damages, corrective labeling, and injunctive relief to ensure Aldi accurately discloses synthetic ingredients in its food products.
13. Dominici v. Hershey
Plaintiff Anthony Dominici has filed a class action lawsuit against The Hershey Company, alleging that its confectionery product packaging contains dangerous levels of PFAS (per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances), also known as “forever chemicals”. The lawsuit asserts that Hershey’s wrappers contain unsafe fluorine levels, which pose significant health risks to consumers.
The complaint highlights FDA regulations that ban PFAS in food packaging, alleging that Hershey knowingly failed to disclose the contamination. Plaintiffs seek compensatory damages, corrective packaging, and injunctive relief to prevent further consumer exposure to toxic chemicals.
14. Elliot v. Keurig Dr Pepper
Plaintiff Lillian Elliot has filed a class action lawsuit against Keurig Dr Pepper, Inc., alleging false advertising of its Schweppes and Canada Dry ginger ale products. The lawsuit contends that Keurig misleads consumers by suggesting its ginger ale is made with real ginger, when in fact it contains artificial flavoring. The complaint cites breach of express warranty, consumer fraud violations, and fraudulent inducement as legal claims.
The case seeks monetary damages, corrective advertising, and injunctive relief to ensure that ginger ale marketing accurately reflects its ingredients. Plaintiffs emphasize transparency in food labeling, misleading beverage claims, and the impact of deceptive marketing on consumer trust.
15. Fogelson v. Snapple Beverage
Plaintiff Stuart Fogelson filed a consumer fraud lawsuit against Snapple Beverage Corp., alleging misleading marketing of its fruit-flavored drinks. The lawsuit claims that Snapple falsely represents its beverages as natural, despite containing synthetic additives and artificial flavors. The complaint argues that consumers rely on clean-label claims, and Snapple’s failure to disclose synthetic ingredients constitutes misbranding under FDA regulations.
Plaintiffs seek monetary compensation, corrective labeling, and marketing transparency to prevent future false advertising claims in the beverage industry.
16. Gay v. Walmart
Plaintiff Dolores Gay filed a false advertising lawsuit against Walmart Inc., claiming that the company misrepresented the cheese content in its Great Value Macaroni & Cheese. The lawsuit argues that Walmart’s “Made with Real Cheddar Cheese” claim is deceptive, as the product contains processed cheese substitutes rather than pure cheddar cheese.
The complaint alleges misleading food labeling, consumer fraud violations, and unfair marketing practices. Plaintiffs seek monetary damages, corrective advertising, and label transparency to ensure that real ingredient claims align with actual product formulations.
17. Gillus v. Arizona Beverages
Plaintiff David Gillus filed a class action lawsuit against Arizona Beverages USA LLC, alleging false labeling of its “All Natural” iced tea products. The lawsuit claims that the beverages contain synthetic additives, despite being marketed as natural. Plaintiffs argue that consumers pay a premium for natural products, and Arizona Beverages’ misrepresentation violates consumer protection laws.
The case seeks monetary compensation, corrective advertising, and stricter labeling guidelines to prevent further misbranding in the beverage industry.
18. Guerrero v. Badia Spices
Plaintiff Erika Guerrero has initiated a class action lawsuit against Badia Spices, Inc., alleging that its ground cinnamon and ginger products contain unsafe levels of lead contamination. The lawsuit cites independent lab testing confirming elevated lead levels, which pose serious health risks to consumers.
The complaint alleges negligence, failure to disclose contamination, and violations of FDA regulations. Plaintiffs seek monetary damages, product recalls, and corrective action to ensure food safety compliance in the spice industry.
19. Herter v. Merrick
Plaintiff Gabriel Herter filed a class action lawsuit against Merrick Pet Care, Inc., alleging false advertising related to its pet food products marketed as “natural.” The lawsuit contends that Merrick misrepresented its pet food by claiming it was free of synthetic ingredients, despite containing xanthan gum, thiamine mononitrate, pyridoxine hydrochloride, and menadione sodium bisulfite complex. These artificial additives contradict Merrick’s “all-natural” branding, misleading health-conscious pet owners.
The case claims that Merrick profited from these deceptive marketing practices and violated consumer protection laws. The lawsuit seeks compensatory damages, corrective labeling, and injunctive relief to prevent future misrepresentation in pet food labeling. Plaintiffs emphasize the need for truthful ingredient disclosures and compliance with consumer rights laws.
20. Keene v. Taylor Foods
Plaintiff Trevor Keene filed a class action lawsuit against Taylor Fresh Foods, Inc., alleging E. coli contamination in its onion products. The lawsuit states that the contaminated onions were used in McDonald’s Quarter Pounder burgers, leading to widespread foodborne illness outbreaks. The Centers for Disease Control (CDC) linked Taylor Farms’ onions to 75 cases of E. coli infections, including 22 hospitalizations and one death.
The complaint alleges strict liability for failure to warn, breach of express and implied warranty, negligence, and fraudulent concealment. Plaintiffs seek medical monitoring, economic damages, and corrective safety measures in fresh produce handling. This case underscores food safety violations, contaminated ingredients, and corporate responsibility in the food supply chain.
21. Legrier v. Hershey
Plaintiff Kendra Legrier filed a class action lawsuit against The Hershey Company, alleging misleading serving size claims on its Skinny Pop White Cheddar Popcorn. The lawsuit claims that the packaging prominently states “43 Calories Per Cup”, but the entire bag actually contains 150 calories, misleading health-conscious consumers into thinking they are consuming fewer calories than they actually are.
The lawsuit alleges violations of FDA nutrition labeling regulations, consumer deception, and false advertising. Plaintiffs seek monetary compensation, corrective labeling, and injunctive relief to ensure that nutritional disclosures reflect actual consumption patterns.
22. McCray v. McDonald’s
Plaintiffs Amanda McCray and William Michael Kraft filed a class action lawsuit against McDonald’s USA, LLC, alleging E. coli contamination in its Quarter Pounder burgers. The complaint states that multiple customers fell ill after consuming the burgers, leading to severe food poisoning symptoms, including diarrhea, vomiting, and fever.
The lawsuit cites negligence in food safety standards, failure to warn consumers, and breach of warranty. Plaintiffs seek medical expenses, compensatory damages, and corrective action in McDonald’s food handling procedures to prevent future contaminated food incidents.
23. Montgomery v. Subway
Plaintiff LaGarris Montgomery filed a class action lawsuit against Subway Restaurants, Inc., alleging false advertising related to its Steak & Cheese Sandwich. The lawsuit contends that Subway’s marketing falsely portrays the sandwich as containing significantly more meat than what customers actually receive. Plaintiffs argue that advertisements depict oversized portions, leading to deceptive business practices.
The lawsuit seeks monetary damages, corrective advertising, and injunctive relief to ensure accurate food marketing representations. This case highlights misleading fast food advertising, consumer rights violations, and corporate accountability in food marketing.
24. Most v. Bright Planet Pet
Plaintiff Ryan Most filed a class action lawsuit against Bright Planet Pet LLC, alleging false advertising regarding its Better Bac’N pet treats. The lawsuit claims that the products were labeled as containing “All Natural Ingredients” despite including synthetic additives like citric acid and coconut glycerin. These chemical additives contradict Bright Planet Pet’s “natural” branding, deceiving pet owners seeking organic products.
The lawsuit seeks compensatory damages, corrective advertising, and label transparency to prevent future deceptive pet food marketing. Plaintiffs emphasize truth in labeling, pet food safety, and consumer trust in natural product claims.
25. Nettle v. Hershey
Plaintiff Jada Nettle filed a class action lawsuit against The Hershey Company, alleging that its chocolate product packaging contains per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), also known as “forever chemicals”. The complaint claims that PFAS contamination in Hershey’s chocolate wrappers poses serious health risks, including cancer, hormone disruption, and reproductive harm.
The lawsuit demands monetary compensation, corrective packaging, and full disclosure of toxic substances in Hershey’s food packaging. Plaintiffs argue that Hershey misrepresented its product safety standards, misleading health-conscious consumers who prioritize clean-label confectionery products.
26. Parish v. Hershey
Plaintiff Jonathan Parish filed a class action lawsuit against The Hershey Company, alleging that its chocolate product packaging contains high levels of PFAS (per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances), also known as “forever chemicals.” The complaint claims that Hershey’s confectionery wrappers tested positive for unsafe levels of fluorine, posing health risks to consumers. These toxic chemicals have been linked to cancer, reproductive harm, and immune system damage.
The lawsuit accuses Hershey of false advertising, negligence, and violations of consumer protection laws by failing to disclose PFAS contamination. Plaintiffs seek compensatory damages, corrective packaging measures, and injunctive relief to prevent further deceptive marketing of Hershey’s products.
27. People of the State of California v. PepsiCo, Inc.
The State of California filed a public nuisance lawsuit against PepsiCo, Inc., Coca-Cola, and their bottling partners, accusing them of contributing to plastic pollution in Los Angeles County. The lawsuit claims that these companies misled consumers by marketing single-use plastic bottles as environmentally sustainable, despite knowing that plastic recycling rates remain extremely low.
The complaint alleges false advertising, violations of California’s Unfair Competition Law, and environmental negligence. The state seeks civil penalties, injunctive relief, and corrective disclosures to address the harmful impact of plastic waste on California’s ecosystem.
28. Pompilio v. Boar’s Head
Plaintiff Frank Pompilio filed a class action lawsuit against Boar’s Head Provisions Co. Inc., alleging false advertising and mislabeling of its “All Natural” deli meats. The complaint states that Boar’s Head misrepresents its ham, bacon, and sausage products by labeling them as free from synthetic additives, despite containing preservatives such as sodium nitrite and ascorbic acid.
The lawsuit claims that Boar’s Head violated consumer protection laws, breach of warranty, and engaged in deceptive trade practices. Plaintiffs seek monetary damages, corrective advertising, and injunctive relief to ensure transparent labeling in the processed meat industry.
29. Reimer v. Eggland’s Best
Plaintiff Peter Meyer Reimer filed a class action lawsuit against Eggland’s Best, Inc., accusing the company of misleading consumers about the welfare of cage-free hens. The lawsuit claims that Eggland’s Best falsely advertises its eggs as produced under humane and natural conditions, while factory farm investigations reveal inhumane treatment of hens.
The lawsuit seeks compensatory damages, injunctive relief, and truthful marketing practices to ensure ethical labeling of cage-free eggs. The case highlights false animal welfare claims, consumer deception, and the impact of misleading labels on premium egg pricing.
30. Robinson v. World Finer Foods
Plaintiff Carol Robinson filed a class action lawsuit against World Finer Foods, Inc., alleging that the company misleads consumers by branding its Wellington Whole Grain Crackers as “Whole Grain”, despite non-whole grain enriched wheat flour being the main ingredient. The lawsuit references similar misrepresentation cases in the food industry.
The lawsuit alleges violations of consumer fraud laws, false advertising, and breach of warranty. Plaintiffs demand monetary compensation, corrective labeling, and market transparency for whole grain food claims.
31. Rodriguez v. Sazerac
Plaintiff Carlos Rodriguez filed a class action lawsuit against Sazerac Company, Inc., alleging false advertising of its Buffalo Trace bourbon whiskey. The lawsuit claims that Sazerac misrepresents the aging process, misleading consumers into believing the product is aged longer than it actually is.
The lawsuit demands monetary damages, corrective advertising, and truthful marketing practices. This case underscores deceptive liquor labeling, false age claims in whiskey marketing, and consumer protection laws in the alcohol industry.
32. Rugg-Harrell v. Treehouse Foods, Inc.
Plaintiff Amanda Rugg-Harrell filed a class action lawsuit against Treehouse Foods, Inc., alleging Listeria contamination in its frozen waffles. The lawsuit claims that Treehouse Foods issued a voluntary recall in October 2024 due to potential Listeria monocytogenes contamination, which can cause serious illness in pregnant women, elderly individuals, and immunocompromised consumers.
The lawsuit seeks medical compensation, injunctive relief, and corrective safety protocols in frozen food production. The case highlights food safety violations, Listeria outbreaks, and corporate responsibility in consumer protection.
33. Santos v. Hershey
Plaintiff Raul Santos, II filed a class action lawsuit against The Hershey Company, alleging that its confectionery packaging contains high levels of PFAS (per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances). The lawsuit claims that Hershey’s wrappers tested positive for toxic fluorine, which is linked to cancer and immune system damage.
The lawsuit demands monetary compensation, corrective packaging, and injunctive relief to prevent further PFAS contamination in food packaging. This case emphasizes food safety concerns, toxic packaging, and consumer rights in product transparency.
34. Stevenson v. Waiakea
Plaintiffs Courtney and Michael Stevenson filed a class action lawsuit against Waiakea Bottling Inc. and Sam’s Club, alleging that Waiakea’s bottled water was contaminated with floating particles and bacteria. The lawsuit states that consumers who drank the Hawaiian volcanic water suffered illnesses, including nausea and stomach distress.
The lawsuit seeks medical compensation, product recalls, and corrective advertising. This case highlights bottled water safety violations, false purity claims, and consumer protection in the beverage industry.
35. Tabb v. Kroger
Plaintiff Pearl Tabb filed a false advertising lawsuit against The Kroger Co., alleging that its private-label food products were falsely marketed as “natural” despite containing artificial flavors and synthetic additives. The lawsuit claims that Kroger misled health-conscious consumers who paid a premium for natural products.
The lawsuit demands monetary damages, corrective labeling, and market transparency in natural food claims. The case emphasizes consumer trust in food labeling, artificial ingredient disclosures, and truth-in-marketing laws.
36. Tollison v. Subway
Plaintiff Anna Tollison filed a class action lawsuit against Subway Restaurants, Inc., alleging false advertising and misleading marketing of its Steak & Cheese Sandwich. The lawsuit claims that Subway’s advertisements falsely depict the sandwich as containing 200% more steak than what customers actually receive. Plaintiffs argue that these misleading food advertisements have resulted in consumer deception and unfair trade practices.
The lawsuit cites customer complaints on social media, with users sharing photo comparisons between Subway’s marketing materials and the actual product received. Plaintiffs seek monetary damages, corrective advertising, and injunctive relief to prevent deceptive fast-food advertising.
37. Triesch v. Topco
Plaintiff Walter Triesch filed a class action lawsuit against Topco Associates LLC, alleging false labeling of its food products as containing “real ingredients” while using artificial additives. The lawsuit emphasizes that consumers are increasingly prioritizing natural ingredients, and misleading claims about preservatives, flavorings, and emulsifiers constitute consumer fraud.
The complaint highlights violations of FDA food labeling regulations, arguing that misbranding food products undermines consumer trust. Plaintiffs seek monetary compensation, corrective labeling, and stricter ingredient disclosure regulations.
38. Van Wagner v. Wellness Pet
Plaintiff Caroline Van Wagner filed a class action lawsuit against Wellness Pet Company, Inc. and WellPet LLC, alleging false advertising in marketing pet food products as “natural” while including synthetic additives. The lawsuit contends that these misleading pet food claims deceive health-conscious pet owners.
Plaintiffs seek compensatory damages, corrective advertising, and injunctive relief to ensure pet food companies accurately disclose synthetic ingredients. This case emphasizes truth in labeling, consumer protection laws, and the impact of deceptive marketing on pet owners.
39. Vasquez v. Hain
Plaintiff Ivonne Vasquez filed a class action lawsuit against The Hain Celestial Group, Inc., alleging that the company misrepresents its food products as free from artificial preservatives while containing synthetic additives such as potassium nitrate, sulfites, and benzoates. The lawsuit argues that consumers seeking clean-label products are being misled by deceptive marketing.
Plaintiffs seek monetary damages, corrective labeling, and injunctive relief to ensure Hain Celestial discloses synthetic ingredients in its products. This case underscores false food labeling, consumer deception, and the demand for transparency in food ingredient disclosures.
40. Vega v. Bosco
Plaintiff Jessica Vega filed a class action lawsuit against Bosco Products, Inc., alleging misrepresentation of its Fair Trade Chocolate Syrup as “free from artificial preservatives” while containing citric acid, a commercially manufactured food additive. The lawsuit argues that Bosco’s misleading labeling deceives consumers who prioritize natural products.
The lawsuit seeks monetary damages, corrective labeling, and injunctive relief to ensure truthful marketing in the chocolate syrup industry. This case highlights deceptive ingredient claims, food safety concerns, and misleading natural product labeling.
41. Venezia v. Aldi
Plaintiff Kayla Venezia filed a class action lawsuit against Aldi Inc., alleging false advertising of fruit-flavored food products. The lawsuit claims that Aldi’s “natural flavors” branding is misleading, as these products contain artificial flavors. Plaintiffs argue that food companies must disclose synthetic ingredients transparently.
The case seeks monetary compensation, corrective labeling, and injunctive relief to prevent false claims in the natural food sector. This case underscores consumer trust in food labeling, artificial flavor disclosures, and regulatory compliance in ingredient marketing.
42. Washington v. Coca-Cola
Plaintiff Anita Washington filed a class action lawsuit against The Coca-Cola Company, alleging misleading marketing of its Fresca sparkling water. The lawsuit claims that Coca-Cola misrepresents its soda water products as unsweetened and naturally flavored, when in fact they contain artificial sweeteners.
The lawsuit demands monetary damages, corrective advertising, and truthful ingredient disclosures. This case highlights deceptive beverage advertising, misleading product descriptions, and the demand for transparency in carbonated drink labeling.
43. Williams v. McDonald’s
Plaintiff Tammy Williams filed a class action lawsuit against McDonald’s USA, LLC, alleging that its Quarter Pounder Burgers were contaminated with E. coli bacteria due to contaminated onions from Taylor Farms. The lawsuit claims that McDonald’s failed to disclose this contamination, putting consumers at risk of foodborne illness.
Plaintiffs seek medical compensation, recalls of contaminated products, and corrective safety measures in fast food handling. This case underscores food safety violations, failure to warn consumers, and corporate accountability in fast food quality control.
44. Wright v. Horizon Organic
Plaintiff Ashley Wright filed a class action lawsuit against Horizon Organic Dairy, LLC, alleging false advertising regarding its organic cheese products. The lawsuit claims that Horizon falsely markets its cheese as containing “No Artificial Flavors or Preservatives”, despite using citric acid and sodium citrate, which are commercially manufactured preservatives.
The lawsuit seeks monetary damages, corrective labeling, and injunctive relief to ensure Horizon’s advertising aligns with its product contents. This case highlights misleading dairy product claims, consumer deception, and the importance of accurate labeling in the organic food industry.
